g.7. Daniel Rudolf VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, geb. 26/07/1865, ged. 17/11/1865

g.7.  Daniel Rudolf, geb. 26/07/1865, Sterkstroom, Tvl., ged. 17/11/1865, Rustenburg, Tvl., oorl. 30/06/1944, Onderstepoort, Tvl x 25/06/1888 met Sophia Elizabeth HENRICO, geb. 23/04/1868, Greykerk, oorl. 10/05/1905, Klipdrift, Pretoria, d.v. Hans Jurgen Henrico en Helena Anna Catharina de Lange xx Anna Maria Jacomina NN.

Daniel Rudolf was die seun van Jacobus Marthinus van der Westhuizen en Carolina Johanna Jacobs.

Sy naam kom voor in hulle pa se sterfkennis van 1874.

Sy naam kom voor in hulle ma se sterfkennis van 1897.

Met hulle huwelik in 1888 word hy beskryf as ‘n 23 jarige jonkman van Klipdrift, dist. Pretoria en sy as 20 jarige dogter van dist. Pretoria.

Volgens sy sterfkennis woon hulle te Klipdrift 123, dist. Pretoria

Anglo Boere-oorlog:

The first sizable batch of Boer prisoners of war taken by the British consisted of those captured at the battle of Elandslaagte on 21 October 1899, which resulted in the capture of 188 Boer prisoners. No camps had been prepared and by arrangement with the Naval authorities these prisoners (approximately 200 men) were temporarily housed on the naval guard ship HMS Penelope in Simon's Bay. Several ships were used as floating prisoner of war camps until permanent camps were established at Greenpoint, Cape Town and Bellevue, Simonstown. The first prisoners were accommodated in Bellevue on 28 February 1900. Wounded prisoners were sent to the old Cape Garrison Artillery Barracks at Simonstown which had been converted into the Palace hospital. The first wounded arrived on 2 November 1899.

Towards the end of 1900 with the first invasion of the Cape Colony the prisoners at Cape Town and Simonstown were placed on board ships. At the end of December 1900 some 2550 men were placed on board the Kildonan Castle where they remained for six weeks before they were removed to two other transports at Simons' bay. The camp at Ladysmith, Natal was in use from 20 December 1900 until January 1902. It was mainly used as a staging camp although it had some 120 prisoners of war. Another staging camp was also established at Umbilo in Natal.

As the number of prisoners grew, for example at Paardeberg, the decision was taken to hold the prisoners away from South Africa. Why overseas? There was nowhere that was suitable in South Africa. There was the problems of transport, the possibility that prisoners might be freed by their comrades and the burden of feeding the men. Of the 28,000 Boer men captured as prisoners of war, 25,630 were sent overseas. (https://www.geni.com/projects/Anglo-Boere-Oorlog-Boer-War-1899-1902-Prisoners-Of-War/12770)

Prisoners of War
Surname
VAN DER WESTHUIZEN
Name
DANIEL RUDOLF
Age
30
Address
KLIPDRIFT
District
PRETORIA
Where Captured
HUMANSKRAAL
When Captured
1900/09/28
Camp
Onbekend
Country
Onbekend
Ship (To)
Onbekend
Ship (Back)
POW Number
13641

Daniel Rudolf en Sophia Elizabeth kom op 20/Mei 1901 by die Irene Konsentrasiekamp aan.

Even before the British reached Pretoria, the capital was overflowing with refugees and the arrival of the British triggered a fresh influx. As a result, Pretoria was forced to supply relief to a substantial number of people from the start of the war. Some of the Boer families were housed in a camp on the banks of the Apies River. Irene camp may have been formed shortly after Kitchener’s notice of 22 September 1900 that camps should be established in Pretoria and Bloemfontein; it was certainly in existence in December 1900 and the Apies River families were then moved to Irene.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

Irene was a large and constantly changing camp, reaching 5,641 inmates at its peak, but averaging about 4,000 people. In the early days many families came from Pietersburg, until a camp was established in the north; in April 1902 the unhealthy Nylstroom camp was closed and its inhabitants moved to Irene although they were always housed separately. Both Pietersburg and Nylstroom were malarial areas and many families from these districts were already debilitated when they arrived at Irene. Along with the people from the Waterberg and Rustenburg, they were mainly impoverished bywoners with few resources. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

One reason for Irene’s poor reputation was the ill health. Measles was present from the first, probably introduced from Pretoria, for the capital was an unhealthy town.  Families from the malarial areas arrived chronically ill and in a wretched state. As in other camps, Franks found that the women were extremely reluctant to enter hospital. Maternity patients were equally reluctant to give birth in hospital, preferring their own midwives. Mortality continued to dog Irene camp. The repeated influx of new arrivals, who could not be isolated, and who had no immunity to the disease, meant that the measles kept finding new hosts. Pneumonia and bronchitis were also continuing sources of concern, especially in the cold winter of 1901. Few of the children were admitted to hospital so they continued to suffer in the tents, treated by their mothers. Fatal disease was never entirely eliminated from Irene camp. The winter months of 1902 brought virulent pneumonia and measles returned as families came back from Merebank in Natal. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/) 

Van der Westhuizens wat sterf in die Irene Konsentrasiekamp:

N

SJ

Maria Susanna M                    V     0.42     Zwartkoppies,     Rustenburg

Gertruida Susanna                  V       10      Rooikoppies,      Pretoria               Siekte

Maria Christina (geb. Mazyn)  V       66      Rooikoppies,      Pretoria               Siekte

Gertruida Catharina                 V         2      Rooikoppies,     Pretoria

Susanna                                  V       26      Roodekopjes,    Rustenburg          Koors

Daniel Rudolf                          M         2      Klipdrift,             Pretoria                Siekte

 (http://www.fak.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ABO-Konsentrasiekamp-sterftelys_-7-1.pdf)

Underlying the ill health was the nutrition. There were two ration scales in the Transvaal, with no meat for families whose men were on commando. While this scale certainly existed on paper, from the first several camps ignored the instruction and within a month, by March 1901, most camps, including Irene, had abandoned it. Nevertheless, the ration scale did not provide enough calories, fat was lacking and vitamins were deficient. But Irene was better off than many camps. From fairly early on the Irene estate supplied some vegetables. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

Although sickness and death dogged everyone, Irene seems to have been a particularly depressed camp. There was also much resentment and conflict between the inmates of Irene. These are generally very bitter against the men in the camp, whom they style “hands-uppers,” and treat so contemptuously that the men will not do anything for them.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

in September and again in November 1901 the first impression was that the camp was ‘untidy and ill-kept’ with tents pitched irregularly on rocky and stony ground. The water supply was regularly polluted by animals, dead and alive, and taps were not repaired. They devoted considerable space to the rations and the way in which they were issued. The meat, they thought, was thin and the weight included bone; the ration looked ‘very scanty’ and the superintendent was unwilling to take the responsibility of increasing it. There was much grumbling about the meat, the Ladies noted, and several people returned their ration and had it replaced. Milk was mixed with boiled water and the place where the milk was handled was filthy. Lack of fuel was another problem and was unnecessary, the Ladies felt, since both wood and coal were readily available. Education was another source of conflict. Although Irene camp had schools from early on, they seem to have been used by the inmates to instil their own culture. By February 1902 the educational system had expanded considerably.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

Despite the disparagement of the Ladies Committee, things were gradually improving in Irene camp. Tinned meat was replaced by fresh mutton, of far better quality than before and the vegetable supply had improved. Many of the tents had been replaced by huts of sun-dried bricks and the tents were enclosed by brick walls to keep out the water. Health, too, was improving. The measles epidemic was spent and the people were more willing to send their children to hospital. ‘Sweeping improvements’ in sanitation in January 1902 reduced the mortality rate even further, although enteric fever continued to be a problem, perhaps because of a contaminated milk supply, the medical officers suspected. In March 1902 the camp was moved from its original site, about 8 miles south of Pretoria, to one which was just west of the railway station. ‘It would be difficult to select a site more healthful and better suited to our purpose’, the superintendent declared. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

Bruce was more successful in persuading the men to work and they were employed as carpenters, saddlers, brickmakers and blacksmiths. Others worked on the farms around Irene. Since all were paid, a good deal of money passed through the camp, enabling the families to improved their living conditions. A handful of men joined the National Scouts and more would have done so, Bruce believed, had it not been for ‘some evil influence’ which was restraining them. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

The end of the war brought in a flood of men from the commandos. This presented its own problems for these Boers were unfamiliar with British ways. There was some friction between the longstanding male inmates and the new arrivals‘ The arrival of the surrendered Burghers after the peace proclamation produced a state of excitement never equalled in Camp. Men, women, and children thronged the boundary and gazed intensely along the road whence the surrendered Burghers were expected to arrive. In spite of the efforts of the Burgher Police, thousands of people stood on prohibited ground outside the Camp to welcome the latest fighting remnant as they returned. There was none of the loud hurrahs or tumult of shouting that usually characterise a British crowd. The hands of the heroes, for such they were accounted, were shaken cordially by the men, and as heartily were their lips kissed by the women. The reception was of a unique nature. In spite of rags and dirt and dust, the women lined up to impress their welcome upon sunburnt cheeks. The young women pinned the colours to their coats, and they were led triumphantly to the tents of their families and friends.’(https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

Repatriation from Irene camp took place fairly rapidly compared with some camps. By the end of July nearly 1,000 people had left. Bruce complained, though, that the burghers were remarkably acquisitive, taking anything they could in the hope that it might be useful to them, including tools and other government property. By September over 5,000 had been repatriated. Irene camp seems to have been closed in December 1902 for no report appears for January 1903. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Irene/)

Personal Details
Name:
Mr Daniel Rudolph van der Westhuizen
Born in camp?
No
Died in camp?
No
Gender:
male
Race:
white
Marital status:
married
Nationality:
Transvaal
Unique ID:
132700
Camp History
Name:
Irene RC
Age arrival:
31
Date arrival:
20/05/1901
Age departure:
32
Date departure:
03/07/1902
Reason departure:
gone to
Destination:
Hammanskraal
Tent number:
RT 481
Farm History
Name:
van der Westhuizen family
Status of
Type:
ABC
Relationships
Mr Daniel Rudolph van der Westhuizen
      is the husband of Mrs Sophia Elizabeth van der Westhuizen
Sources
  
Personal Details
Name:
Mrs Sophia Elizabeth van der Westhuizen
Born in camp?
No
Died in camp?
No
Gender:
female
Race:
white
Marital status:
married
Nationality:
Transvaal
Registration as head of family:
Yes
Unique ID:
132699
Camp History
Name:
Irene RC
Age arrival:
33
Date arrival:
13/03/1901
Age departure:
34
Date departure:
03/07/1902
Reason departure:
gone to
Destination:
Hammanskraal
Tent number:
RT 481
Farm History
Name:
van der Westhuizen family
Relationships
Mrs Sophia Elizabeth van der Westhuizen
      is the mother of Master Daniel Rudolph van der Westhuizen
      is the wife of Mr Daniel Rudolph van der Westhuizen
      is the mother of Miss Helena A C van der Westhuizen
      is the mother of Master Hans J van der Westhuizen
      is the mother of Master Jacobus M van der Westhuizen
      is the mother of Miss Sophia Elizabeth van der Westhuizen
Sources
Title:
DBC 62 Irene CR
Type:
DBC 62
Reference No.:
DBC 62
Notes:
p. W 03