g.6. Daniel Pieter VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, geb. 18/10/1870, ged. 13/01/1871

g.6.  Daniel Pieter (Daan), geb. 18/10/1870, ged. 13/01/1871, Rustenburg, Tvl,, oorl. 02/10/1956, Deelfontein, dist. Bothaville x 19/07/1892, Rustenburg, Tvl. met Catharina Margaretha Maria COETZEE, geb. 1872, oorl. 11/12/1919, d.v. Roelof Johannes Coetzee en Catharina Maria van Dyk xx 03/04/1920, Potchefstroom, Tvl. met Elzabe Luitha ROOS, geb. 01/01/1894, oorl. 25/12/1961, d.v. Jacobus Gerhardus Roos en Sophia Margaretha Johanna Swart.

Daniel Pieter was die seun van Daniel Pieter van der Westhuizen en Cecilia Jacoba Magdelena Schoombee.

Uit hulle pa se sterfkennis van 1889:
NASIONALE ARGIEWE VAN SUID-AFRIKA






https://www.geni.com/people/Daniel-Pieter-van-der-Westhuizen/6000000007104375056


https://www.geni.com/people/Elzabe-Luitha-van-der-Westhuizen/6000000007104551826

Anglo Boere-oorlog:

Daniel Pieter en Catharina Magrietha kom op 11 Januarie 1901 by die Brandfort Konsentrasiekamp aan.

The Brandfort camp had certainly been formed by the end of January 1901, when it was reported that there were about two hundred people living there, mainly from Bultfontein and Hoopstad. At this stage many of the Boer families were scattered through the town or living in wagons, rather than in tents. Some of the people living in the town were able to support themselves and the British authorities were reluctant to supply them with rations. Nor did the British want to force them into the camps. By August 1901, when Dr Kendal Franks visited the camp, everyone had been moved into tents.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Brandfort/)

From the first, the medical officer was concerned about health in the camp. A number of small children were suffering from diarrhoea, although there had been no fatalities. Women and children slept on the ground with little protection and the doctor was concerned that they would suffer from pulmonary diseases in the wet weather. He urged the erection of corrugated iron huts with wooden floors or the provision of mattresses at the very least. Blankets would be provided only where absolutely necessary, along with mattress ticking. The women must make their own bedding with 15 lbs of hay allowed them, the MO was informed. Fortunately at this stage the inmates still had the cattle which they had brought into camp with them and milk was freely available for the children. Later on, however, grazing deteriorated and the refugee stock was sold to the ORC administration and removed to farms nearer to Bloemfontein. (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Brandfort/)

By the end of March 1901 numbers in the white camp were mounting and, as in other camps, people arrived without warning and tents were in short supply. Health declined and typhoid was prevalent. Hospital accommodation was inadequate and the wagons and tents were overcrowded. The new arrivals were often in a desperate state. Some had been in a Boer laager in the Hoopstad district for some months; the children were clad only in sheep skins and hides and they had been on very short rations.  Come they did – 3 000 arrived on 9 August 1901, in a bad state of health, with only 25 tents to accommodate them. Many of the new arrivals suffered from trachoma, an eye disease caused by flies and fairly common amongst the Dutch, the MO reported. One source of disease, Dr Kendal Franks was convinced, was the insanitary condition of the nearby town of Brandfort, which he considered was primitive. Much of the drinking and cooking water came from open sluits [furrows]; excrement was emptied into cesspools close to the water wells; cattle roamed the town and slaughtering of cattle took place there as well. Measles and diphtheria broke out there before the camps. In an attempt to isolate the camp, the inmates were prevented from going into town but, since the military commandant continued to issue passes, some contact was inevitable. Worse still, the military authorities sent about a hundred people from the town to the camp. Diphtheria spread to the camp by the middle of August although, fortunately, it was the one disease for which there was an effective drug therapy, known as an anti-toxin, which was provided. Measles soon followed. Once the measles epidemic started, there was the problem of hospital accommodation for the sick. Brandfort was a camp with a particularly high mortality rate, peaking in October 1901 and coinciding with the diphtheria epidemic, brought in by a group of people ‘in very poor condition from continual trekking’. The measles epidemic spread so rapidly that attempts at isolation broke down and there were so many cases that the hospital could not house them all. Worse still, the disease was so severe that almost every case developed broncho-pneumonia ‘with very fatal results’.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Brandfort/)

The water supply was a constant struggle. Camp washing took place above the dam which supplied the town’s water, to which the municipality understandably objected. Since the town was so dirty, the camp authorities were not very sympathetic but they agreed to sink more boreholes. By February 1902, when camp management had become more sophisticated, conditions had improved.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Brandfort/)

Pratt Yule duly arrived. He was reasonably satisfied with the general condition of the camp. Some of the tents were worn but the latrines, now built of brick, were ‘beautifully clean’ and the water supply was good. But the hospital was a different story. By December 1901, George Randle, sent in a long report on the condition of Brandfort camp. The place, he felt, was untidy. Brandfort was the last of the ORC camps to be closed. An orphanage was established there to provide for the many children who had lost their parents during the war and had no relatives to care for them. The camp authorities tried to see that such children were looked after properly. The orphaned children were not the only people to remain in Brandfort camp. In September 1902 the superintendent reported that he still had over 2 000 people in his camp and the great majority ‘show no great desire to leave’. Eventually relief works were set up for bywoners who were unable to return to the land and the superintendent was urged to persuade the people to leave in larger numbers. It became a considerable struggle to dispose of the remaining inmates, by January consisting largely of the old and infirm, or widows and orphans with no support. The last of the orphans left towards the end of March 1903, either to other orphanages or to relatives. Widows were more of a problem. In March 1903 there were still 343 people left in Brandfort camp, seven of them old, blind and broken down but homes were finally found for them all.  (https://www2.lib.uct.ac.za/mss/bccd/Histories/Brandfort/)

Personal Details
Name:
Mr Daniel Pieter van der Westhuizen
Born in camp?
No
Died in camp?
No
Gender:
male
Race:
white
Marital status:
married
Nationality:
Free Statet
Occupation:
farmer
Registration as head of family:
Yes
Unique ID:
95897
Camp History
Name:
Brandfort RC
Age arrival:
30
Date arrival:
11/01/1901
Date departure:
29/07/1902
Reason departure:
transfer
Destination:
Kroonstad RC
Stock into camp:
no
Stock out of camp:
no
Name:
Kroonstad RC
Farm History
Name:
Deelfontein
District:
Kroonstad
Status
Type:
oath of neutrality
Notes:
01 Jun 1900, Kroonstad
Relationships
Mr Daniel Pieter van der Westhuizen
      is the husband of Mrs Cathrina Maria van der Westhuizen
Sources
Title:
SRC 76 Brandfort CR
Type:
Camp register
Location:
Free State Archives Repository
Reference No.:
SRC 76
Notes:
p.159 (56)

Personal Details
Name:
Mrs Cathrina Maria van der Westhuizen
Born in camp?
No
Died in camp?
No
Gender:
female
Race:
white
Marital status:
married
Nationality:
Free State
Unique ID:
95898
Camp History
Name:
Brandfort RC
Age arrival:
28
Date arrival:
11/01/1901
Date departure:
29/07/1902
Reason departure:
transfer
Destination:
Kroonstad RC
Farm History
Name:
Deelfontein
District:
Kroonstad
Relationships
Mrs Cathrina Maria van der Westhuizen
      is the wife of Mr Daniel Pieter van der Westhuizen
Sources
Title:
SRC 76 Brandfort CR
Type:
Camp register
Location:
Free State Archives Repository
Reference No.:
SRC 76
Notes:
p.159

Woon Deelfontein, dist. Bothaville